# Architecture relationships > Every algorithm contract in this domain is listed with its position on the derivation loop, its intent and invariant, the flow it walks and its productions as a… Page: Ontology · Algorithms Canonical: https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms#algorithms-domain-arch-relationships Listed in [Ontology · Algorithms](https://banes-lab.com/api/pages/ontology/algorithms.md), after [Architecture](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-architecture.md) and before [Architectural Clusters](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-architectural-clusters.md). Every algorithm contract in this domain is listed with its position on the derivation loop, its intent and invariant, the flow it walks and its productions as a grammar. Each record also shows what it composes and is composed by, which forces and principles it answers to, what grounds it and what it grounds, and an exemplar where the record carries one. The diagram shows what composes what inside the domain. Relations diagram What composes what inside this domain. ```mermaid flowchart LR n_architectural_relationship_record["Architectural Relationship Record"] n_architecture_knowledge_graph["Architecture Knowledge Graph"] n_architectural_force_classification["Architectural Force Classification"] n_dependency_closure["Dependency Closure"] n_reinforcement_propagation["Reinforcement Propagation"] n_conflict_and_tension_resolution["Conflict and Tension Resolution"] n_severity_policy["Severity Policy"] n_violation_detection["Violation Detection"] n_measurement_normalization["Measurement Normalization"] n_refactor_selection["Refactor Selection"] n_enforcement_gate["Enforcement Gate"] n_architecture_assessment["Architecture Assessment"] n_modular_boundary_compliance["Modular Boundary Compliance"] n_contract_compatibility["Contract Compatibility"] n_canonical_semantics["Canonical Semantics"] n_self_description_and_discovery["Self-Description and Discovery"] n_runtime_extensibility["Runtime Extensibility"] n_pattern_selection["Pattern Selection"] n_event_and_messaging_consistency["Event and Messaging Consistency"] n_state_and_transaction_safety["State and Transaction Safety"] n_correctness_verification["Correctness Verification"] n_resilience_policy["Resilience Policy"] n_observability_and_auditability["Observability and Auditability"] n_performance_and_scalability["Performance and Scalability"] n_security_governance["Security Governance"] n_architecture_evolution_governance["Architecture Evolution Governance"] n_control_plane_coordination["Control Plane Coordination"] n_metaprogramming_safety["Metaprogramming Safety"] n_model_lifecycle_governance["Model Lifecycle Governance"] n_architectural_recommendation["Architectural Recommendation"] n_architecture_fitness_function_generation["Architecture Fitness Function Generation"] n_architecture_refactoring_roadmap["Architecture Refactoring Roadmap"] n_concept_cluster_extraction["Concept Cluster Extraction"] n_architecture_decision_support["Architecture Decision Support"] n_relationship_schema_validation["Relationship Schema Validation"] n_architecture_catalog_compiler["Architecture Catalog Compiler"] n_master_architecture_governance_kernel["Master Architecture Governance Kernel"] n_architectural_relationship_algebra["Architectural Relationship Algebra"] n_architecture_assessment --> n_dependency_closure n_architecture_assessment --> n_violation_detection n_architecture_assessment --> n_measurement_normalization n_architecture_evolution_governance --> n_architecture_assessment n_architectural_recommendation --> n_dependency_closure n_architecture_fitness_function_generation --> n_architectural_relationship_record n_architecture_fitness_function_generation --> n_enforcement_gate n_architecture_fitness_function_generation --> n_severity_policy n_master_architecture_governance_kernel --> n_relationship_schema_validation n_master_architecture_governance_kernel --> n_concept_cluster_extraction n_master_architecture_governance_kernel --> n_dependency_closure n_master_architecture_governance_kernel --> n_violation_detection n_master_architecture_governance_kernel --> n_measurement_normalization n_master_architecture_governance_kernel --> n_refactor_selection n_master_architecture_governance_kernel --> n_enforcement_gate n_master_architecture_governance_kernel --> n_architecture_decision_support n_architectural_relationship_algebra --> n_dependency_closure n_architectural_relationship_algebra --> n_violation_detection n_architectural_relationship_algebra --> n_measurement_normalization n_architectural_relationship_algebra --> n_refactor_selection n_architectural_relationship_algebra --> n_enforcement_gate n_architectural_relationship_algebra --> n_architecture_evolution_governance ``` ### Architectural Relationship Record - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [graph](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-graph.md) - Yields: edge-list Details Intent Represent every architectural concept as a typed relationship record containing scope, dependencies, reinforcing effects, enabled capabilities, conflicts, tensions, violations, detection signals, metrics, refactor actions, enforcement mechanisms, and severity. Invariant An architecture principle becomes operational when it is converted from a name into a measurable, enforceable relationship contract. Flow ```text Concept → Type → Scope → Requires → Violations → Detection → Measurement → Refactor → Enforcement → Severity ``` Productions ```bnf ArchitecturalRelationshipRecord ::= ":" "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," "," RecordType ::= "Principle" | "Quality Attribute" | "Contract" | "Architecture Style" | "Pattern" | "Mechanism" | "Metric" | "Practice" EnforcementSeverity ::= "mandatory" | "recommended" | "contextual" | "discouraged" MandatoryFor ::= "contextual" "+" ``` Composes none Composed by [Architecture Fitness Function Generation](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-fitness-function-generation.md) Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md) Grounds none Before ```text 'Low Coupling' as a bare name in a list — not measurable, not enforceable. ``` After ```text Low Coupling : Quality-Attribute, scope{module}, requires{Abstraction}, conflicts_with{Tight Coupling}, detected_by{cycle scan}, measured_by{coupling metric}, refactored_by{invert dependency}, enforced_by{dependency rule}, severity{mandatory} ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architecture Knowledge Graph - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [graph](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-graph.md) - Yields: edge-list Details Intent Parse all relationship records into a directed multigraph where concepts are nodes and fields such as requires, reinforces, enables, conflicts, tensions, detects, measures, refactors, and enforces are typed edges. Invariant The architecture catalog becomes reusable when its relationships can be traversed as a graph. Flow ```text Records → Nodes → TypedEdges → Graph → QueryableArchitectureModel ``` Productions ```bnf ArchitectureGraph ::= "," ConceptNode ::= "," "," "," RelationshipEdge ::= "→" "→" RelationType ::= "requires" | "reinforces" | "enables" | "conflicts_with" | "tensions_with" | "violated_by" | "detected_by" | "measured_by" | "refactored_by" | "enforced_by" ``` Composes none Forces [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text A flat list of relationship records — no way to ask 'what does Foo require, transitively?' ``` After ```text records → nodes{concepts} + typed-edges{requires, reinforces, enables, conflicts_with} → traversable graph ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architectural Force Classification - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Given a design issue or desired quality, classify it into a force family, then select all concepts whose scope, type, violation signals, and enabled capabilities match that force. Invariant Architectural decisions should be selected by force and evidence, not by pattern name recognition. Flow ```text Issue → ForceFamily → CandidateConcepts → ApplicableContracts ``` Productions ```bnf ForceClassification ::= "→" "→" "→" ForceFamily ::= "modularity" | "contract_compatibility" | "semantic_consistency" | "domain_boundary" | "runtime_extensibility" | "object_creation" | "structural_mediation" | "behavioral_variation" | "event_messaging" | "state_transaction" | "correctness_verification" | "resilience_recovery" | "observability_traceability" | "causality_ordering" | "performance_scaling" | "security_governance" | "architecture_evolution" | "control_coordination" | "metaprogramming_modeling" | "streaming_dataflow" | "model_governance" ``` Composes none Forces [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text A design issue answered by pattern-name recall ('use a Factory'). ``` After ```text issue{concrete constructor everywhere} → force{object_creation} → concept-query → applicable{Construction Boundary} ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Dependency Closure - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [graph](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-graph.md) - Yields: edge-list Details Intent For any target architectural concept, recursively collect its required concepts until no new requirements remain, then order the closure by dependency depth before implementation. Invariant A principle cannot be adopted safely unless its prerequisites are also satisfied. Flow ```text TargetConcept → RequiresEdges → TransitiveClosure → DependencyOrder ``` Productions ```bnf DependencyClosure ::= "→" "→" "→" RequiresTraversal ::= "follow requires edges until fixed point" TopologicalOrder ::= "prerequisites_before_dependents" ``` Composes none Composed by [Architecture Assessment](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-assessment.md), [Architectural Recommendation](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architectural-recommendation.md), [Master Architecture Governance Kernel](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/master-architecture-governance-kernel.md), [Architectural Relationship Algebra](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architectural-relationship-algebra.md) Forces [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text Adopt Foo without checking what Foo needs — its prerequisites are silently unmet. ``` After ```text target{Foo} → follow requires-edges to fixed point → {Bar, Baz} → topological order{Baz, Bar, Foo} ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Reinforcement Propagation - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [graph](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-graph.md) - Yields: edge-list Details Intent When a concept is implemented or strengthened, traverse its reinforces and enables edges to identify secondary quality gains and architecture capabilities unlocked. Invariant Architecture improvements produce second-order effects through reinforcing relationships. Flow ```text ImplementedConcept → Reinforces + Enables → CapabilityImpact ``` Productions ```bnf ReinforcementPropagation ::= "→" "→" "→" ImpactSet ::= "," QualityGain ::= "," "," ``` Composes none Forces [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text Foo implemented; its second-order gains go unnoticed and unclaimed. ``` After ```text satisfied{Foo} → reinforces → {Bar quality} → enables → {Baz capability} → impact set with confidence ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Conflict and Tension Resolution - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent For each selected concept, collect conflicts and tensions, classify conflicts as prohibitive or resolvable, classify tensions as trade-offs, and require an explicit decision when severity or impact is high. Invariant Architecture is not only principle application; it is trade-off governance. Flow ```text CandidateConcept → Conflicts + Tensions → TradeoffAnalysis → Decision ``` Productions ```bnf ConflictTensionResolution ::= "→" "→" "→" ResolutionPolicy ::= "reject_combination" | "accept_with_mitigation" | "document_tradeoff" | "require_architecture_decision" | "contextual_override" ``` Composes none Forces [security_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/security-governance.md) Grounds none Before ```text Two chosen concepts silently conflict at runtime; the developer never decided the trade-off. ``` After ```text candidates{Foo, Bar} → conflict{prohibitive} → tension{trade-off} → policy{require architecture decision} ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Severity Policy - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [optimization](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-optimization.md) - Yields: boolean | ranking Details Intent Interpret severity as an enforcement policy: mandatory concepts become gates, recommended concepts become review findings, contextual concepts require scope justification, and discouraged concepts require explicit exception approval. Invariant Severity converts architecture knowledge into governance behavior. Flow ```text Severity → EnforcementMode → GateBehavior ``` Productions ```bnf SeverityPolicy ::= "→" EnforcementMode ::= "blocking_gate" | "review_warning" | "context_required" | "exception_required" | "informational" SeverityMapping ::= "mandatory → blocking_gate" | "recommended → review_warning" | "contextual → context_required" | "discouraged → exception_required" ``` Composes none Composed by [Anti-Pattern Rule Compiler](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/anti-pattern-rule-compiler.md), [Architecture Fitness Function Generation](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-fitness-function-generation.md) Forces [security_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/security-governance.md) Grounds none Before ```text Every finding treated the same — a style nit blocks like a critical flaw. ``` After ```text severity{mandatory} → blocking-gate ; severity{recommended} → review-warning ; severity{contextual} → context-required ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Violation Detection - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent For each concept applicable to the current scope, execute its detected_by signals against the implementation, map observations to violated_by patterns, and produce evidence-backed violation records. Invariant A principle violation must be grounded in observable implementation signals. Flow ```text ApplicableConcept → DetectionSignals → Observations → ViolationRecords ``` Productions ```bnf ViolationDetection ::= "→" "→" "→" ViolationRecord ::= "," "," "," "," "," ``` Composes none Composed by [Architecture Assessment](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-assessment.md), [Master Architecture Governance Kernel](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/master-architecture-governance-kernel.md), [Architectural Relationship Algebra](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architectural-relationship-algebra.md) Forces [observability_traceability](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/observability-traceability.md), [model_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/model-governance.md) Grounds none Before ```text 'Foo is violated' asserted from opinion, with no observable signal. ``` After ```text concept{Foo} → detected_by signals run on code → observations → violation-record{concept, pattern, evidence, severity} ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Measurement Normalization - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [analysis](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/axis-analysis.md) - Yields: operation Details Intent Convert each concept’s measured_by field into executable or reviewable metrics, collect metric values, normalize them to comparable scores, and attach confidence based on measurement quality. Invariant Architectural assessment requires metrics with provenance, not free-form judgment. Flow ```text MeasuredBy → MetricDefinition → Measurement → NormalizedScore → Confidence ``` Productions ```bnf MeasurementNormalization ::= "→" "→" "→" MetricDefinition ::= "," "," "," "," ``` Composes none Composed by [Architecture Assessment](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-assessment.md), [Master Architecture Governance Kernel](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/master-architecture-governance-kernel.md), [Architectural Relationship Algebra](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architectural-relationship-algebra.md) Forces [semantic_consistency](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/semantic-consistency.md) Grounds none Before ```text Architecture judged by free-form opinion, no comparable numbers. ``` After ```text measured_by{coupling} → metric-definition{scope, method, threshold} → values → normalized score + confidence ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Refactor Selection - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [optimization](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-optimization.md) - Yields: boolean | ranking Details Intent Given a violation record, select refactor actions from the concept’s refactored_by field, rank actions by severity, dependency closure, blast radius, and expected reinforcement gain. Invariant Refactoring should be selected from the violated concept’s remediation contract. Flow ```text Violation → RefactorCandidates → RiskRank → SelectedPlan ``` Productions ```bnf RefactorSelection ::= "→" "→" "→" RefactorRanking ::= "severity" "," "required_dependency_count" "," "blast_radius" "," "reinforcement_gain" "," "rollback_feasibility" ``` Composes none Composed by [Master Architecture Governance Kernel](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/master-architecture-governance-kernel.md), [Architectural Relationship Algebra](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architectural-relationship-algebra.md) Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md) Grounds none Before ```text A fix chosen ad hoc, unrelated to the violated concept's remediation contract. ``` After ```text violation{Foo} → refactored_by candidates → rank{severity, blast-radius, reinforcement-gain} → refactor plan ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Enforcement Gate - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Translate each concept’s enforced_by field into static checks, contract tests, schema validation, CI gates, policy rules, runtime monitors, review gates, or architecture fitness functions. Invariant Enforcement converts architectural intent into repeatable control. Flow ```text EnforcementDescriptor → GateType → ValidationProcedure → Pass|Fail ``` Productions ```bnf EnforcementGate ::= "→" "→" "→" GateType ::= "static_analysis" | "architecture_test" | "schema_validation" | "contract_test" | "lint_rule" | "fitness_function" | "runtime_monitor" | "policy_as_code" | "review_gate" ``` Composes none Composed by [Architecture Fitness Function Generation](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-fitness-function-generation.md), [Master Architecture Governance Kernel](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/master-architecture-governance-kernel.md), [Architectural Relationship Algebra](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architectural-relationship-algebra.md) Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [runtime_extensibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/runtime-extensibility.md), [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md), [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text 'enforced_by: review' — a reviewer's promise that erodes under deadline. ``` After ```text enforced_by{Foo} → gate-type{static-analysis | contract-test | fitness-function} → pass/fail in CI ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architecture Assessment - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [optimization](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-optimization.md) - Yields: boolean | ranking Details Intent Select concepts relevant to a target scope, compute dependency closure, detect violations, measure evidence, rank findings by severity, and emit a prioritized architecture assessment. Invariant Assessment is graph query plus evidence collection plus severity policy. Flow ```text Scope → RelevantConcepts → DependencyClosure → Detection → Measurement → Findings ``` Productions ```bnf ArchitectureAssessment ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" FindingPrioritization ::= "mandatory_first" "," "high_blast_radius" "," "high_reinforcement_gain" "," "low_refactor_cost" ``` Composes [Dependency Closure](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/dependency-closure.md), [Violation Detection](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/violation-detection.md), [Measurement Normalization](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/measurement-normalization.md) Composed by [Architecture Evolution Governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-evolution-governance.md) Forces [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text 'The architecture is fine' — an unscoped, evidence-free claim. ``` After ```text scope → relevant concepts → dependency-closure → violation-detection → measurement → prioritized findings ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Dependency Closure](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/dependency-closure.md), [Violation Detection](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/violation-detection.md), [Measurement Normalization](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/measurement-normalization.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### Modular Boundary Compliance - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Evaluate SRP, separation of concerns, cohesion, coupling, encapsulation, information hiding, abstraction, modularity, composability, replaceability, and autonomy as a connected boundary cluster. Invariant Modular design is not one principle; it is a mutually reinforcing cluster around responsibility, dependency, and visibility. Flow ```text Module → Responsibility → Cohesion → Coupling → Visibility → BoundaryHealth ``` Productions ```bnf ModularBoundaryCompliance ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" BoundaryScore ::= "," "," "," "," ``` Composes none Forces [modularity](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/modularity.md), [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md) Grounds none Before ```text Modularity judged as one vague impression. ``` After ```text modules → responsibility + cohesion + coupling + visibility-leak → boundary score{per-dimension} ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Contract Compatibility - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent For APIs, services, data, schemas, and protocols, validate explicit contracts, preconditions, postconditions, invariants, versioning, backward compatibility, forward compatibility, and interoperability. Invariant Compatibility is the contract cluster that allows independent evolution. Flow ```text Boundary → Contract → Version → CompatibilityMatrix → Gate ``` Productions ```bnf ContractCompatibility ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" CompatibilityMatrix ::= "producer_current_consumer_current" | "producer_new_consumer_old" | "producer_old_consumer_new" | "unknown_field_handling" | "breaking_diff_check" ``` Composes none Composed by [Loop-Owned Mode Selection](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/loop-owned-mode-selection.md), [](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/mode-driven-response-schema.md) Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md), [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text A schema changed and downstreams broke — compatibility was never checked. ``` After ```text boundary-contract → schema/semantic validation → version-policy → compatibility-matrix{new-producer/old-consumer} → verdict ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Canonical Semantics - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [set-theory](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-set-theory.md) - Yields: set | boolean Details Intent Detect duplicated or conflicting models, schemas, terms, rules, and data definitions; select or create canonical authority; normalize variants; enforce single source of truth. Invariant Semantic consistency requires canonical authority and explicit translation where contexts differ. Flow ```text Concepts → Conflicts → CanonicalAuthority → Normalization → Enforcement ``` Productions ```bnf CanonicalSemantics ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" SemanticArtifact ::= "schema" | "domain_model" | "field" | "term" | "rule" | "configuration" ``` Composes none Composed by [Composed Turn Contract](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/composed-turn-contract.md) Forces [semantic_consistency](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/semantic-consistency.md), [model_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/model-governance.md) Grounds none Before ```text Three models of 'Foo' drift apart; no single authority. ``` After ```text artifacts{Foo-a, Foo-b} → conflict-detection → canonical authority → normalize variants → SSOT gate ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Self-Description and Discovery - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [set-theory](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-set-theory.md) - Yields: set | boolean Details Intent Require components, services, APIs, plugins, and runtime structures to declare metadata, capabilities, contracts, dependencies, configuration, and health so they can be discovered and validated. Invariant Dynamic architecture requires self-description before runtime binding. Flow ```text Component → Manifest → CapabilityDeclaration → Discovery → ContractValidation → Binding ``` Productions ```bnf SelfDescribingDiscovery ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" Manifest ::= "identity" "," "version" "," "capabilities" "," "dependencies" "," "contracts" "," "configuration" "," "health" ``` Composes none Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [runtime_extensibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/runtime-extensibility.md) Grounds none Before ```text A runtime component's capabilities are unknowable without reading its source. ``` After ```text entity → manifest{identity, capabilities, contracts} → discovery → conformance-validation → bind only if it matches ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Runtime Extensibility - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Detect repeated core modification for variants, define extension points, create plugin contracts, register implementations, discover them dynamically, and isolate failures. Invariant Extensibility is controlled variation behind stable runtime contracts. Flow ```text VariantPressure → ExtensionPoint → PluginContract → Registry → Discovery → Isolation ``` Productions ```bnf RuntimeExtensibility ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" RegistrationPolicy ::= "manual_registration" | "manifest_based" | "service_registry" | "convention_based" | "configuration_based" ``` Composes [Runtime Discovery](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/runtime-discovery.md) Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [runtime_extensibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/runtime-extensibility.md) Principle [Runtime Extensibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/architecture/runtime-extensibility.md) Grounds none Before ```text Every new variant edits the core switch statement. ``` After ```text variant-pressure → extension-point → plugin-contract → registry → runtime-discovery → failure-isolation ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Runtime Discovery](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/runtime-discovery.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### Pattern Selection - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [optimization](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-optimization.md) - Yields: boolean | ranking Details Intent Select creational, structural, or behavioral patterns based on the problem force: creation variation, interface mismatch, access control, behavior variation, notification, workflow reuse, or coordination complexity. Invariant Design patterns are remedies for specific force shapes, not generic decorations. Flow ```text ProblemForce → PatternFamily → CandidatePattern → ApplicabilityCheck ``` Productions ```bnf PatternSelection ::= "→" "→" "→" PatternFamily ::= "creational" | "structural" | "behavioral" CandidatePattern ::= "factory" | "factory_method" | "abstract_factory" | "builder" | "prototype" | "adapter" | "facade" | "proxy" | "bridge" | "decorator" | "strategy" | "template_method" | "observer" | "mediator" ``` Composes none Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [control_coordination](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/control-coordination.md) Grounds none Before ```text A pattern applied as decoration ('let's add a Facade') with no force to justify it. ``` After ```text force{interface mismatch} → family{structural} → candidate{Adapter} → applicability verdict ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Event and Messaging Consistency - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent For asynchronous systems, validate event contracts, message schemas, idempotent consumers, outbox publication, correlation metadata, ordering guarantees, retry behavior, and dead-letter handling. Invariant Event-driven architecture is safe only when messages are contracts and consumers are replay-safe. Flow ```text StateChange → EventContract → Outbox → Broker → IdempotentConsumer → Trace ``` Productions ```bnf EventMessagingConsistency ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" EventClassification ::= "domain_event" | "integration_event" | "stream_event" PublicationReliability ::= "transactional_outbox" | "append_only_log" | "broker_acknowledgement" ``` Composes [Observability Trace](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/observability-trace.md) Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [state_transaction](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/state-transaction.md), [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md), [resilience_recovery](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/resilience-recovery.md), [observability_traceability](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/observability-traceability.md), [event_messaging](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/event-messaging.md), [causality_ordering](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/causality-ordering.md) Grounds none Distinct from [Event Messaging](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/event-messaging.md): Event messaging describes how state changes are published and consumed; this record validates that the published messages are contracts and that consumers are safe to replay. Before ```text Events published ad hoc; a consumer replays and double-applies. ``` After ```text state-change → event-contract → transactional-outbox → broker → idempotent-consumer → ordering + trace ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Observability Trace](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/observability-trace.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### State and Transaction Safety - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Identify state mutation boundaries, enforce unit-of-work scope, validate invariants, apply concurrency control, guarantee idempotency where retries exist, and isolate side effects. Invariant State correctness depends on explicit mutation boundaries and repeat-safe effects. Flow ```text Command → TransactionBoundary → Invariant → Concurrency → Commit|Rollback → Idempotency ``` Productions ```bnf StateTransactionSafety ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" ConcurrencyControl ::= "optimistic_locking" | "pessimistic_locking" | "serial_execution" | "state_isolation" SideEffectPolicy ::= "idempotent" | "outbox_published" | "compensatable" | "controlled_side_effect" ``` Composes [Transaction Boundary](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/transaction-boundary.md) Forces [modularity](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/modularity.md), [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [state_transaction](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/state-transaction.md), [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md), [resilience_recovery](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/resilience-recovery.md) Grounds none Before ```text Two mutations with no boundary; a crash between them corrupts state. ``` After ```text command → transaction-boundary → invariant-check → concurrency-control → commit/rollback → idempotent side-effect ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Transaction Boundary](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/transaction-boundary.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### Correctness Verification - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Push nondeterminism to boundaries, prefer pure deterministic core logic, validate specifications with static analysis, type checks, property tests, contract tests, formal methods where useful, and reproducible test environments. Invariant Correctness is achieved by deterministic design plus evidence-based verification. Flow ```text Input → Canonicalize → DeterministicCore → Spec → Verification → Evidence ``` Productions ```bnf CorrectnessVerification ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" VerificationMethod ::= "type_check" | "static_analysis" | "schema_validation" | "contract_test" | "property_based_test" | "specification_test" | "formal_verification" | "runtime_validation" ``` Composes [Deterministic Core](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/deterministic-core.md) Forces [modularity](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/modularity.md), [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [runtime_extensibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/runtime-extensibility.md), [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md) Grounds none Before ```text Correctness asserted by 'it worked on my machine'. ``` After ```text input → canonicalize → deterministic-core → spec → {type-check, property-test, contract-test} → evidence ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Deterministic Core](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/deterministic-core.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### Resilience Policy - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Classify failure modes, apply fail-fast, fail-safe, fail-secure, retry, timeout, circuit breaker, fallback, bulkhead, backpressure, health check, failover, and rollback policies according to dependency criticality. Invariant Resilience is controlled degradation under known failure modes. Flow ```text FailureMode → Criticality → PolicySet → RuntimeGuard → Recovery ``` Productions ```bnf ResiliencePolicy ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" ResiliencePattern ::= "timeout" | "retry" | "circuit_breaker" | "fallback" | "bulkhead" | "backpressure" | "health_check" | "failover" | "rollback" | "auto_remediation" ``` Composes none Forces [state_transaction](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/state-transaction.md), [resilience_recovery](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/resilience-recovery.md) Grounds none Before ```text A remote call with no failure policy takes the whole system down. ``` After ```text failure-modes → criticality → {timeout, retry, circuit-breaker, bulkhead} → runtime-guard → recovery ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Observability and Auditability - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [graph](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-graph.md) - Yields: edge-list Details Intent Attach correlation and causation identifiers, emit logs, metrics, traces, alerts, audit records, and runtime health signals, then reconstruct behavior as a causal execution graph. Invariant Operability requires reconstructable evidence across runtime boundaries. Flow ```text Operation → Correlation → Telemetry → Audit → TraceGraph → Diagnosis ``` Productions ```bnf ObservabilityAuditability ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" TelemetryEvent ::= "structured_log" | "metric" | "trace_span" | "alert" | "audit_log" | "health_signal" ``` Composes none Forces [modularity](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/modularity.md), [observability_traceability](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/observability-traceability.md), [causality_ordering](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/causality-ordering.md) Grounds none Before ```text An incident with no correlation ids — behavior can't be reconstructed. ``` After ```text operation → correlation-id + causation-id → {logs, metrics, traces, audit} → trace-graph → diagnosis ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Performance and Scalability - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [optimization](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-optimization.md) - Yields: boolean | ranking Details Intent Establish workload model, profile runtime behavior, benchmark repeatably, identify bottlenecks, analyze time and space complexity, select scaling strategy, optimize only measured bottlenecks, and enforce SLO gates. Invariant Performance engineering is evidence-driven bottleneck control, not speculative optimization. Flow ```text Workload → Profile → Benchmark → Bottleneck → Complexity → Scale|Optimize → SLO ``` Productions ```bnf PerformanceScalability ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" ScalingOrOptimizationPlan ::= "vertical_scale" | "horizontal_scale" | "load_balance" | "shard" | "partition" | "cache" | "stream" | "rate_limit" | "algorithm_replacement" ``` Composes none Forces [performance_scaling](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/performance-scaling.md), [model_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/model-governance.md) Grounds none Before ```text Optimize by guesswork; add capacity and hope. ``` After ```text workload → profile → benchmark → bottleneck → complexity → scale/optimize the measured bottleneck → SLO gate ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Security Governance - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Threat-model the system, reduce attack surface, authenticate identity, authorize actions, validate input, encode output, encrypt data, manage secrets, enforce policy as code, and continuously audit compliance. Invariant Security is an enforced policy graph over identity, data, operations, and infrastructure. Flow ```text ThreatModel → ControlSet → Policy → Enforcement → Audit ``` Productions ```bnf SecurityGovernance ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" SecurityControl ::= "authentication" | "authorization" | "least_privilege" | "zero_trust" | "input_validation" | "output_encoding" | "encryption_at_rest" | "encryption_in_transit" | "secrets_management" | "audit_logging" ``` Composes none Forces [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md), [security_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/security-governance.md), [model_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/model-governance.md) Grounds none Before ```text Security added as a late checklist, not a policy graph. ``` After ```text threat-model → controls{authn, authz, validation, encryption, secrets} → policy-as-code → enforcement → continuous audit ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architecture Evolution Governance - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [optimization](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-optimization.md) - Yields: boolean | ranking Details Intent Assess architecture against quality attributes, record decisions, analyze impact, track gaps, enforce standards with fitness functions, standardize patterns, and evolve through ADR-backed controlled change. Invariant Evolutionary architecture requires decision memory and continuous fitness validation. Flow ```text Assessment → GapAnalysis → DecisionRecord → FitnessFunction → ChangePlan → Review ``` Productions ```bnf ArchitectureEvolutionGovernance ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" DecisionRecord ::= "ADR" "," "context" "," "decision" "," "consequences" "," "status" ``` Composes [Architecture Assessment](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-assessment.md) Composed by [Architectural Relationship Algebra](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architectural-relationship-algebra.md), [Version Provenance](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/version-provenance.md), [Type-Migration Centralization](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/type-migration-centralization.md) Forces [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md), [security_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/security-governance.md), [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text Architecture drifts; no decision memory, no fitness checks. ``` After ```text assessment → gap-analysis → ADR → fitness-functions → change-plan → review gate ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Architecture Assessment](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-assessment.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### Control Plane Coordination - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Separate control-plane policy from data-plane execution, centralize configuration, authentication, logging, or orchestration only where shared governance is beneficial, and preserve local autonomy where decentralization is required. Invariant Control centralization should govern policy without collapsing execution autonomy. Flow ```text Policy → ControlPlane → DataPlane → Telemetry → PolicyAdjustment ``` Productions ```bnf ControlPlaneCoordination ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" ControlConcern ::= "configuration" | "authentication" | "authorization" | "logging" | "orchestration" | "service_registry" ``` Composes [Control Plane](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/control-plane.md) Forces [semantic_consistency](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/semantic-consistency.md), [security_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/security-governance.md), [control_coordination](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/control-coordination.md) Grounds none Distinct from [Control Plane](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/control-plane.md): The control plane is the mechanism that coordinates policy; this record composes it and decides which concerns are centralized and which stay local. Before ```text Every service does its own config + auth; policy scatters and drifts. ``` After ```text policy → control-plane{config, authn, orchestration} → data-planes execute → telemetry → governance adjustment ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Control Plane](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/control-plane.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### Metaprogramming Safety - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Treat code as data only through schemas, manifests, DSL grammars, reflection contracts, compile-time checks, runtime guards, and generated artifact validation. Invariant Metaprogramming is safe when generated behavior is bounded by a validated model. Flow ```text Model → Schema → Transform → Generate|Interpret → Validate → Execute ``` Productions ```bnf MetaprogrammingSafety ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" TransformationEngine ::= "reflection" | "introspection" | "compile_time_evaluation" | "runtime_code_generation" | "DSL_interpreter" | "model_driven_generator" ``` Composes none Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md), [model_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/model-governance.md), [metaprogramming_modeling](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/metaprogramming-modeling.md) Grounds none Before ```text Code-as-string eval'd with no schema or bound. ``` After ```text model → schema → transform{reflection | DSL} → generated artifact → safety-validation → bounded execution ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Model Lifecycle Governance - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Register and version models, prompts, datasets, embeddings, retrieval sources and knowledge graphs, evaluate behavior against benchmarks, validate safety constraints, trace inference inputs through an inference contract, and monitor drift after deployment. Invariant Model-backed architecture requires governance over evidence, model behavior, inference, evaluation, and safety. Flow ```text ModelArtifact → Registry → Evaluation → Safety → InferenceTrace → Monitoring ``` Productions ```bnf ModelLifecycleGovernance ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" ModelArtifact ::= "model" | "prompt" | "embedding_index" | "retrieval_source" | "knowledge_graph" | "dataset" | "evaluation" InferenceContract ::= "input_schema" "," "retrieval_context" "," "model_version" "," "output_schema" "," "explanation_or_trace" ``` Composes none Forces [contract_compatibility](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/contract-compatibility.md), [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md), [observability_traceability](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/observability-traceability.md), [security_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/security-governance.md), [model_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/model-governance.md) Grounds none Before ```text A model shipped with no registry, eval, trace, or safety gate. ``` After ```text artifacts{model, prompt, index} → governance-registry → evaluation → inference-contract → explainability-trace → safety + monitoring ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architectural Recommendation - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [optimization](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-optimization.md) - Yields: boolean | ranking Details Intent Given a target problem, query the graph for matching violated_by and detected_by signals, collect candidate concepts, compute required dependencies, remove conflicting concepts, rank by severity and reinforcement gain, then recommend an ordered implementation path. Invariant Recommendations are graph-derived paths from evidence to enforceable architecture change. Flow ```text ProblemEvidence → CandidateConcepts → DependencyClosure → ConflictPrune → Rank → Roadmap ``` Productions ```bnf ArchitecturalRecommendation ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" SeverityRanking ::= "mandatory_before_recommended" "," "contextual_when_scope_matches" "," "discouraged_requires_exception" ``` Composes [Dependency Closure](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/dependency-closure.md) Forces [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text Advice given from intuition, not from the graph or the evidence. ``` After ```text problem-evidence → concept-match → dependency-closure → conflict-prune → severity rank → ordered roadmap ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Dependency Closure](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/dependency-closure.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architecture Fitness Function Generation - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [computation](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-computation.md) - Yields: procedure Details Intent Convert mandatory and high-impact recommended records into executable fitness functions by binding detected_by signals to checks, measured_by fields to thresholds, and enforced_by fields to pipeline gates. Invariant The catalog becomes self-enforcing when records compile into fitness functions. Flow ```text RelationshipRecord → DetectionCheck → MetricThreshold → EnforcementGate → FitnessFunction ``` Productions ```bnf FitnessFunctionGeneration ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" FitnessFunction ::= "," "," "," "," "," "," ``` Composes [Architectural Relationship Record](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architectural-relationship-record.md), [Enforcement Gate](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/enforcement-gate.md), [Severity Policy](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/severity-policy.md) Forces [streaming_dataflow](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/streaming-dataflow.md), [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text Mandatory records sit as prose no check executes. ``` After ```text record → detection-check + metric-threshold + enforcement-gate → executable fitness function ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Architectural Relationship Record](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architectural-relationship-record.md), [Enforcement Gate](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/enforcement-gate.md), [Severity Policy](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/severity-policy.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architecture Refactoring Roadmap - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [algebra](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-algebra.md) - Yields: ordered-structure Details Intent Group violations by shared refactor actions, order remediation by prerequisite concepts, apply low-risk structural fixes first, then enforce newly satisfied concepts through gates. Invariant Architecture repair is more efficient when refactors are grouped by shared conceptual cause. Flow ```text Violations → SharedCause → RefactorGroup → DependencyOrder → Apply → Enforce ``` Productions ```bnf RefactoringRoadmap ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" SharedCause ::= "missing_boundary" | "missing_contract" | "semantic_drift" | "concrete_coupling" | "uncontrolled_state" | "missing_observability" | "manual_governance_only" ``` Composes none Forces [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md) Grounds none Before ```text Violations fixed one-by-one in random order; shared causes re-fixed repeatedly. ``` After ```text violations → cluster by shared-cause{missing-boundary} → refactor-groups → dependency-ordered plan → enforce ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Concept Cluster Extraction - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [set-theory](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-set-theory.md) - Yields: set | boolean Details Intent Group concepts into clusters by mutual requires, reinforces, enables, and shared scope; treat clusters as higher-order architectural concerns. Invariant Large principle catalogs become usable when concepts are clustered by relationship density. Flow ```text Graph → EdgeDensity → Cluster → ConcernFamily ``` Productions ```bnf ConceptClusterExtraction ::= "→" "→" "→" ConcernFamily ::= "," "," "," "," ``` Composes none Composed by [Master Architecture Governance Kernel](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/master-architecture-governance-kernel.md) Forces [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text A flat catalog of hundreds of concepts, unusable at scale. ``` After ```text graph → relationship-density analysis → clusters → concern-families{core + supporting + conflict concepts} ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architecture Decision Support - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [optimization](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-optimization.md) - Yields: boolean | ranking Details Intent For each proposed design decision, compute satisfied concepts, violated concepts, tensions introduced, conflicts triggered, enabled capabilities, and enforcement cost; require ADR when trade-offs are nontrivial. Invariant A design decision should be evaluated as a graph delta. Flow ```text Decision → GraphDelta → BenefitSet + RiskSet → ADRRequired? ``` Productions ```bnf ArchitectureDecisionSupport ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" DecisionGovernance ::= "approve" | "approve_with_ADR" | "revise" | "reject" ``` Composes none Composed by [Master Architecture Governance Kernel](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/master-architecture-governance-kernel.md) Forces [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text A design decision judged by gut feel, not by its effect on the graph. ``` After ```text decision → graph-delta{satisfied, violated, tensions, enabled} → enforcement-cost → approve / approve-with-ADR / revise / reject ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Relationship Schema Validation - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [logic](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-logic.md) - Yields: boolean Details Intent Validate every concept record for required fields, known relation names, parseable scope, valid severity, nonempty detection and enforcement metadata, and resolvable references where possible. Invariant The architectural catalog itself must be governed as a schema-bearing artifact. Flow ```text Record → SchemaCheck → ReferenceCheck → CompletenessCheck → Valid|Invalid ``` Productions ```bnf RelationshipSchemaValidation ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" RequiredFieldSet ::= "type" "," "scope" "," "requires" "," "reinforces" "," "enables" "," "conflicts_with" "," "tensions_with" "," "violated_by" "," "detected_by" "," "measured_by" "," "refactored_by" "," "enforced_by" "," "severity" ``` Composes none Composed by [Master Architecture Governance Kernel](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/master-architecture-governance-kernel.md) Forces [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md) Grounds none Before ```text Catalog records with missing fields and dangling references ship unchecked. ``` After ```text records → required-field validation → reference-resolution → severity validation → completeness score → catalog validity ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architecture Catalog Compiler - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [computation](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-computation.md) - Yields: procedure Details Intent Compile the relationship catalog into four executable artifacts: assessment rules, refactor playbooks, decision-support graphs, and governance gates. Invariant A comprehensive architecture catalog should compile into operational tooling. Flow ```text Catalog → Rules + Playbooks + DecisionGraph + Gates ``` Productions ```bnf ArchitectureCatalogCompiler ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" AssessmentRule ::= "," "," "," RefactorPlaybook ::= "," "," ``` Composes none Forces [security_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/security-governance.md) Grounds none Before ```text The catalog read only by the developer — no operational output. ``` After ```text graph → {assessment-rules, refactor-playbooks, decision-support-model, governance-gates} ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on Not answered Shape it refuses Not answered ### Master Architecture Governance Kernel - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Math type: [computation](https://banes-lab.com/records/reasoning/math-type-computation.md) - Yields: procedure Details Intent Parse the catalog, validate records, build the graph, classify target scope, select relevant concept clusters, compute dependency closure, detect violations, measure evidence, resolve conflicts, generate refactor plans, enforce gates, and record decisions. Invariant The catalog can be executed as a governance kernel for architecture assessment, remediation, and evolution. Flow ```text Catalog → Graph → Scope → Concepts → Detection → Metrics → Refactor → Enforcement → ADR ``` Productions ```bnf MasterArchitectureGovernanceKernel ::= "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" "→" GovernanceReport ::= "," "," "," "," "," "," "," ``` Composes [Relationship Schema Validation](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/relationship-schema-validation.md), [Concept Cluster Extraction](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/concept-cluster-extraction.md), [Dependency Closure](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/dependency-closure.md), [Violation Detection](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/violation-detection.md), [Measurement Normalization](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/measurement-normalization.md), [Refactor Selection](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/refactor-selection.md), [Enforcement Gate](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/enforcement-gate.md), [Architecture Decision Support](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-decision-support.md) Forces [correctness_verification](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/correctness-verification.md), [security_governance](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/security-governance.md), [architecture_evolution](https://banes-lab.com/records/force/architecture-evolution.md) Grounds none Before ```text Assessment, remediation, and evolution done by disconnected manual steps. ``` After ```text validate → graph → scope → clusters → closure → detect → measure → resolve → refactor → enforce → ADR → governance report ``` How it is checked Checked by the ontology resolution gate, which validates every relationship record's fields, relations and references Population Every architecture record in the catalog Freshness A verdict stands until a record or the relation ranges change Refusal The gate fails on a dangling edge, an out-of-range relation, an unknown severity or an empty required field Observation None, because the catalog is data; the checks its records name observe the systems Evidence Watched to fire and to accept: a suite plants an unchecked principle, a blank required field, a severity outside the closed levels and a definition that opens as another kind, and the bundled records pass Authoritative side The relation ranges and the closed field vocabularies, which every record conforms to Depends on [Relationship Schema Validation](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/relationship-schema-validation.md), [Concept Cluster Extraction](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/concept-cluster-extraction.md), [Dependency Closure](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/dependency-closure.md), [Violation Detection](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/violation-detection.md), [Measurement Normalization](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/measurement-normalization.md), [Refactor Selection](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/refactor-selection.md), [Enforcement Gate](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/enforcement-gate.md), [Architecture Decision Support](https://banes-lab.com/records/algorithms/architecture-decision-support.md) Shape it refuses Not answered ### Architectural Relationship Algebra - Domain: [arch-relationships](https://banes-lab.com/ontology/algorithms/algorithms-domain-arch-relationships.md) - Tier: [leaf](https://banes-lab.com/records/vocabulary/domain-tier-leaf.md) - Meta record Details Intent → → →